Law.com Home Newswire LawJobs CLE Center LawCatalog Our Sites Advertise
New York Lawyer Advertisement:
Click Here
A New York Law Journal publication

Home | Register | Login | Classified Ads | Message Boards

Search
Public Notices
New! Create a Domestic LLC/LLP Public Notice
Law Firms
NYLJ Professional
Announcements
The NYLJ 100
The AmLaw 100
The AmLaw 200
The AmLaw Midlevel
Associates Survey
The Summer
Associates Survey
The NLJ 250
Beyond Firms
The New York Bar Exam
Pro Bono
NYLJ Fiction Contest
Get Advice
Advice for the Lawlorn
Crossroads
Work/Life Wisdom
Message Boards
Services
Contact Us
Corrections
Make Us Your
Home Page
Shop LawCatalog.com
This Week's
Public Notices
Today's Classified Ads
Who We Are
 
 
Alternative Careers

New York Lawyer
June 26, 2001

Q:
Even though I was unhappy as a junior associate and planned to leave anyway, I was recently asked to leave the firm and given two months notice. If I�m going to work in a different kind of setting, do I have to reveal that I was let go?

Submit Your
Question
Find More
Answers
A:
This is the classic �yes, but . . . � situation, the thorniest possible �spin control� issue. In fact, how you characterize your departure may depend on what the firm agrees to by way of a reference statement.

Ethically and practically, you should avoid any material misrepresentation of fact which could leap up and bite you in a reference check or a coincidental conversation between your new employer and the associate development partner of your past law firm. On the other hand, you are not obliged to torch your own marketability, either.

If your firm says that they will give you �a positive reference,� don�t stop there and hope for the best. Try to negotiate some agreement on how your departure will be characterized: Not enough work? Not a temperamental or motivational fit? Practice area dwindling? Almost anything is better than huge bloody whacks at your technical expertise (�she knew nothing about tax�), work ethic (�just couldn�t hack the pace,� �couldn�t turn out the work�), native intelligence (�dumber than a box of hammers�) or social skills (�doesn�t play well with others,� �bridles against authority,� �hopelessly na�ve,� or �arrogant jerk�).

Many firms will agree to a benign �tale� that suggests mutual agreement that the situation wasn�t working, without flagging specific skills/knowledge deficits or fundamental work habit or interpersonal problems: �We both recognized that my long term career prospects probably lay outside a large-firm setting, and we agreed to an amicable parting of the ways.� If a questioner persists and asks, �Were you pushed or did you jump?� I believe you must acknowledge that the option to stay or leave was not yours. One way to take the sting out of this, however, is with a �they simply got me before I got them� rationale:

I had been aware from some months that this was not a good fit. Nothing against Big, Bigg & Huge, but I realized that I would be far happier in a setting the provided more [fill in the blank]. So I already had begun testing the waters in the [where you�re going] sector, but meanwhile, I wasn�t about to resign and cut off my livelihood. I don�t know if the firm found out I was looking or just came to the same conclusion I did. But yes, they put a specific time frame around my disengaging from the firm. And that proved to be a good thing.

Please note a couple things about this explanation. First, no matter how badly or unfairly you think you may have been treated, do not badmouth the firm. Burn no bridges, create no justification for anyone in the firm to hose you down publicly. You can�t win that war. Secondly, in reciting your motives, cast your reasons for switching in terms of what you want more of, not what you want to escape. �I hated the politics, the overspecialization and the oppression of billing every waking minute� may be true, but it�s the whine of a malcontent. �I realized I�d be more comfortable and more productive in a setting that provided more autonomy . . . � or �. . . where I was a cost center and not a profit-center . . . � or � . . . that drew more directly on my project management aptitudes than on my expertise in generating-skipping taxation . . . �

Generally, try to start with a broad, colloquial generalization, and see if that will satisfy the interrogator: �Well, in many ways it was a classic big-firm bad fit.� You�d be surprised at how many interviewers, particularly those that love to hate lawyers and the legal profession, will nod sagely and say, �Yes, I know what that�s like,� without having the slightest clue what you�re saying. But they may send you signals that your explanation suffices. So don�t over-explain. Be ready with progressively more detail if pushed, but don�t feel obliged to lay out an inch-by-inch litany of your descent into unemployment.

In describing your departure from your last job, remember that the real issue is whether it reflects any issues that would re-emerge in a new job in a new setting. Very few jobs, for example, �carve up life into six-minute billable increments,� so you can express a desire for a broader way of defining your value without bumming out the potential employer. I�ve had someone look me straight in the eye and say, �I recognized almost immediately that I�ll always be better suited for a generalist role than a specialist role. I�m glad I found it out so young and so soon.� It had the absolute ring of truth. Another said, �they recognized that I�d made a fundamental error in career path even before I did.� This �limited mea culpa� also met the sniff test.

The basic issue is not whether your firm let you go � after all, this is not uncommon � but why it didn�t work. You have to sound self-aware enough to communicate how your next career objective will avoid or remedy whatever issues led to your ouster. It is, however, worth thinking through a variety of answers . . . and practicing them a few times in front of the mirror. If the question, �why did you leave your last job?� makes your heart race, your knuckles whiten, and the pitch of your voice climb an octave, the interviewer may not know what you�re hiding, but he or she will sense you�re hiding something. And remember, they don�t have to explain why they�re not hiring you . . .

Sincerely,
Douglas B. Richardson
President, The Richardson Group


 




All Today's Classified Ads

ATTORNEY

ROCKEFELLER CENTER

lawjobs
Search For Jobs

Job Type

Region

Keyword (optional)


LobbySearch
Find a Lobbyist
Practice Area
State Ties


Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

  About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Terms & Conditions