Page 2 - 2014_0331_ssADR
P. 2



S2 | MONDAY, MARCH 31, 2014 | Alternative Dispute Resolution
| NYLJ.COM






International Arbitration 

BY LUIS O’NAGHTEN 
AND MARTIN DOMB
In New York and Miami
O 
n March 4, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court 
decided BG Group v. Argentina, possibly 
the most important Supreme Court case
to specifically address international arbitra- 
Both venues get more active.
tion. That decision may effectively make the 
United States the world’s most friendly inter- 

national arbitration jurisdiction. Simply put, 
the court ruled that when a party attempts to 
enforce an international arbitration award and 
the losing party attempts to defend against 
enforcement by arguing that certain precondi- 
tions to the arbitration agreement were not 
met, a court should give deference to the 
arbitrator’s decision and not conduct a de 

novo review.
To the extent that parties enter into inter- 
national arbitration agreements because they 
prefer to keep the courts away from decid- 
ing these types of gateway issues regarding 
arbitrability, the Supreme Court’s decision is 
welcome news. Indeed, even in some of the 
most international arbitration friendly nations 
in the world, such as France, where courts 

are prohibited from interfering with ongoing 
international arbitration proceedings, at the 
enforcement stage, courts are permitted to 
review gateway issues regarding arbitrabil- 
ity de novo and do not afford any deference 
to the decisions made by the arbitral panel.
The Supreme Court’s decision is particu- 
larly good news for New York and Miami, 
the two cities that stand to gain the most as 

international arbitration venues. Although 
New York has long been recognized as the 
most popular U.S. venue for international 
arbitrations, Miami has come a long way in 
establishing itself as the second most popular 
venue in the United States. In 2013, the Inter- 
national Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the 
oldest and most important entity administer- 

ing international arbitrations, reported that 
of all ICC arbitrations venued in the United 
States, 54 percent were located in New York, 
while Miami came in second with 22 percent. 
No other U.S. city rose above the 6 percent 
mark. In recognition of Miami’s place in the


K
LUIS O’NAGHTEN is a partner at Akerman in Miami OC
and chair of the international litigation and arbitra- GST
tion practice. MARTIN DOMB is a partner in the firm’s BI
litigation practice in New York.





Inside
Alternative Dispute Resolution

S
S4	Mediating With a Litigation S6	Abitrating Against S8	Boundaries of FAA and Reverse S
Committee or Trust Non-Signatories: Preemption Under the McCarran- 
The Current State of Play Ferguson Act Kris Fischer, Editor-In-Chief 
BY LESLIE BERKOFF
BY JOHN DELLAPORTAS
BY ALEXANDER D. HARDIMAN
Angela Turturro, Sections Editor 
AND PETER A. HALPRIN
Miguel Romero, Designer
S
S

© 2014 ALM MEDIA PROPERTIES, LLC.
THE NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL ® 
IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK 
COVER ILLUSTRATION: BIGSTOCK/NYLJ
OF ALM MEDIA PROPERTIES, LLC.





   1   2   3   4   5