Page 2 - White-Collar Crime
P. 2



S2 | MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 | White-Collar Crime
| NYLJ.COM





FCA Overpayments: 
The and 

BY JACQUELINE C. WOLFF 
AND ARUNABHA BHOUMIK
New Risks H
‘Kane’ Creates ealth care providers that treat Medicare 
and Medicaid patients regularly face a 
quandary: What should they do when
faced with the possibility that they may have 
For Health Care Providers
been overpaid by the government for their 
services? Overpayments could result from 

innocent coding errors stemming from confu- 
sion over complex billing rules. Or they could 
result from a physician committing fraud by 
knowingly prescribing medically unnecessary 
procedures. Since 2010, the law has been clear 
that providers are required to pay back over- 
payments within 60 days of being identiied, 
or else risk liability under the False Claims 

Act (FCA). 31 U.S.C. §3729 et seq.
But what is not clear is when the 60-day 
period starts to run. Does it begin when the 
provider learns of a possible overpayment, 
for example from a disgruntled employee who 
claims that services billed were medically 
unnecessary? Or does it begin only once the 
provider has conirmed there has been an 
overpayment? How much money, time and 

energy must a provider spend investigating, 
especially if the government is itself investi- 
gating the overpayment? And how promptly 
must the provider complete the investigation?
In a recent case of irst impression, U.S. ex rel. 
Kane v. Continuum Health Partners, No. 11 Civ. 
2325, 2015 WL 4619686 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2015),1 
Judge Edgardo Ramos directly addressed these 
issues. By taking an expansive view of what 

constitutes “identiication” of an overpayment, 
Kane has signiicantly expanded the scope of 
potential FCA liability for health care providers.

Statutory Background

Enacted during the Civil War, the False 
Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §3729 et seq. was 

intended to combat the scourge of govern- 
ment contractors defrauding the govern- 
ment by iling fraudulent claims for payment. 
The FCA allows the government, or private 
whistleblowers (called “relators”), to sue to 
recover the monies wrongfully paid out. If


K
JACQUELINE WOLFF is co-chair of the corporate inves- OC
tigations and white-collar defense group at Manatt, GST
Phelps & Phillips. ARUNABHA BHOUMIK is co-chair of BI
the irm’s false claims act group.





Inside
White-Collar Crime


S4 Federal Sentencing:
S6 The Challenge of Misplaced S8 Abacus Federal Savings Bank S
S
The Impact of ABA Report
Whistleblower Incentives And the Dangers of Cooperation 
And Amendments to Guideline Without Representation
Kris Fischer, Editor-In-Chief 
BY JOHN T. ZACH
For Economic Crimes
AND RANDALL W. JACKSON
BY JAMES GLASSER
Angela Turturro, Sections Editor 
BY MARK S. COHEN
AND JENNY CHOU
Agnieszka Czuj, Design
AND SCOTT WILCOX
S

S

© 2015 ALM MEDIA PROPERTIES, LLC.
THE NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL ® 
IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK 
COVER ILLUSTRATION: BIGSTOCK
OF ALM MEDIA PROPERTIES, LLC.





   1   2   3   4   5