Page 3 - White Collar
P. 3





NYLJ.COM |
White-Collar Crime | MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2014 | S3






Get the Marcum 2013/2014 Year-End Tax Guide
Early on, DOJ touted the success of its ously in connection with healthcare-related 
organized crime strike forces in much the offenses. A July 2010 nationwide takedown 
Visit our website to download your copy today @ www.marcumllp.com
same way as it now does the success of MFSF: appears to be the largest such takedown to 
“Individuals indicted during 1968 as a result of date, with the arrest of 94 individuals across 
strike force strategy numbered 71 in Brooklyn, the country for allegedly participating in 
67 in Detroit, 34 in Buffalo, 12 in Chicago and schemes to submit approximately $251 mil- 
5 in Philadelphia.”2
lion in Medicare claims.5
At the time of the merger of the strike Over the years that MFSF has been in exis- 

forces with local U.S. Attorneys Ofices in
tence, it has utilized other hallmarks of the



In addition to takedowns of discreet cases in particular cities, in
late 2009, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force began conducting 

periodic nationwide takedowns, with individuals being arrested 
in a number of cities simultaneously in connection with healthcare- 

related ofenses.


1990, there were 14 strike forces across the strike force approach to ighting organized 

Marcum LLp, one of the largest business country, located in Brooklyn, Buffalo, Chicago, crime besides multi-agency cooperation and 
valuation practices outside the “Big 4”, Cleveland, Detroit, Kansas City, Las Vegas, sprawling takedowns, including employing 
Los Angeles, Miami, New Orleans and San electronic surveillance techniques, expanding 
has the expertise, experience and Francisco.3
the range of crimes charged, obtaining (and 
resources to provide the litigation, The success of the organized crime strike issuing press releases regarding) long prison 
valuation and investigative services force approach (and continuing efforts of the sentences imposed on individuals, and even 
you deserve.
U.S. Attorneys’ Ofices) was incontrovert- having “most wanted” healthcare fugitives. 
ible. Waves of prosecutions relentlessly tak- Penalties of ines, forfeiture and restitution 
ing down the successive hierarchies of the have been utilized to recoup public monies 
ive New York City-based families of La Cosa and disincentivize fraudsters.
Nostra is one of the more memorable local    
examples. While perhaps surprising at irst Discover the Diference
blush, the use of a variation on this approach The Current Look of MFSF Cases
to combat white-collar crime, including health A review of MFSF prosecutions in 2013 pro- ASSURANCE I TAX I ADVISORY 
International Member of Leading Edge Alliance
care fraud, now seems a logical, even inevi- vides numerous insights into the increasingly 
table, law enforcement strategy.
broad scope and continuing effectiveness 
of the strike force approach to combatting 
The Birth and Evolution of the MFSM
healthcare fraud:
Many Venues of Prosecution. DOJ and 
MFSF was initiated in March 2007, in what its partners brought cases across the coun- 
came to be Phase One, in the Southern Dis- try, including in California, Florida, Illinois, 
trict of Florida (Miami). A year later, in March Louisiana, Michigan, New York, Pennsylva- 
2008, Phase Two was kicked off in the Central nia, Texas and Utah. Certain federal districts 
District of California (Los Angeles). As part of had a particularly high concentration of MFSF 
the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforce- cases, including the Southern District of Flor- 
ment Action Team (HEAT) initiative, a joint ida, Eastern District of Michigan and Central 
effort by DOJ and HHS, in 2009, MFSF expand- District of California.
ed to Detroit, Houston, Brooklyn, Tampa and Variety of Health Care Providers Tar- 

Baton Rouge. In 2011, the program expanded geted. Cases targeted executives of a health 
to the total of nine cities it is today, by adding maintenance organization; the owner/opera- 
Dallas and Chicago.
tor of an oncology center; the medical director 
Phase One of MFSF was announced in of a hospice; the owner and program coordi- 
connection with a May 2007 takedown in nator of an adult day care center; owners and 
the Southern District in Florida involving the others associated with partial hospitalization 
indictment of organizations and individuals programs (PHPs); owners and others associ- 
in connection with allegedly conspiring to ated with home health care agencies; owners 
defraud the Medicare program, making false and others associated with DMEs; owners of 
claims and violating the anti-kickback stat- ambulance services; and doctors, registered 
ute. Thirty-eight individuals were arrested. nurses and other medical professionals.
Collectively, approximately $142 million was Types of Crimes Charged. Charges includ- 
allegedly billed in Medicare. MFSF was then ed healthcare fraud for submitting false and 
described as “a multi-agency team of federal, fraudulent claims to Medicare, violations of 

state and local investigators designed specii- the anti-kickback statute, and, in some recent 
cally to combat Medicare fraud through the cases, money laundering.
use of real-time analysis of Medicare billing Wide-ranging penalties. Sentences includ- 
data,” focusing on schemes involving infu- ed the imposition of lengthy prison terms; 
sion therapy and durable medical equipment ines, restitution, and forfeiture; exclusions 
(DMEs).4
from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal 
MFSF became much more. There was the and state health programs; and compliance 
noted expansion to nine cities. In addition to requirements.
takedowns of discreet cases in particular cit- Some speciic matters further illustrate 
ies, in late 2009, MFSF began conducting peri- the scope of MFSF’s efforts and its results.
odic nationwide takedowns, with individuals 1. May 2013 Nationwide Takedown.
being arrested in a number of cities simultane-
As noted above, MFSF’s sixth » 
Page S10





   1   2   3   4   5